AIToday
AI Business & IndustryAI WeeklyPublished: Oct 31, 2026, 04:00 JST

Goldman: AI-displaced workers jobless a month longer

Send on LINE
Goldman: AI-displaced workers jobless a month longer

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Goldman Sachs economist Pierfrancesco Mei analyzed more than 15,000 displaced workers and found those from AI-exposed jobs since 2025 took about a month longer to reemploy and were roughly 10 percentage points more likely to still be jobless a year on.

  2. Why it matters

    The delay and higher jobless rate suggest AI-related displacement carries a lasting reemployment penalty, not a brief interruption, according to the Goldman analysis.

WHO IT HITSOlder workers and long-tenured employees displaced from AI-exposed roles face longer jobless spells and lower reemployment odds, based on the Goldman analysis.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The Goldman analysis arrives as employers are naming AI directly in layoff announcements. Through September, companies blamed AI for 120,136 announced job cuts, about 21% of all cuts and the top reason given, according to the report. That backdrop helps explain why the study focuses on workers whose positions were eliminated, not just those in AI-exposed occupations.

The Labor Department survey behind the analysis counted 7.4 million workers displaced from 2023 through 2025, up from 6.3 million in the prior period. Within that larger pool, Mei's AI-exposure score isolates the top 30% of displaced workers, and the reemployment gap he finds is measured against other displaced workers rather than against all workers.

Mei also looked at earlier technology-driven disruptions and found that in the years after losing a job to technology, workers' real earnings grew more slowly than those of other displaced workers. The paper does not break the one-month delay down by occupation or publish a list of which jobs sit inside the top-30% exposure bucket, so the specific roles most affected remain unspecified. The same day, a separate Careerminds reading found that a third of AI layoffs have since been reversed, suggesting some displacement may prove temporary even as the Goldman data points to longer jobless spells for those affected.

FAQ
How did Goldman Sachs define an AI-displaced worker?
Economist Pierfrancesco Mei built an AI-exposure score from an occupation's AI exposure, an industry's AI adoption rate, and whether the position itself was eliminated. He treated the top 30% of scores as AI-displaced.
How many job cuts did employers blame on AI through September?
Employers cited AI for 120,136 announced job cuts through September, about 21% of all cuts and the top reason given.
Did older or younger AI-displaced workers take longer to return to full-time work?
AI-displaced workers 35 and older took about five weeks longer than other displaced workers to get back to full-time work. For those under 35, it was about three weeks.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleGoogle's Project Suncatcher satellite runs Gemma 4 AI in space