AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryThe Verge AIPublished: Oct 4, 2026, 01:00 JST

Splice CEO Kakul Srivastava warns AI emails kill real talk

Splice CEO Kakul Srivastava warns AI emails kill real talk

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Splice CEO Kakul Srivastava said she is "careful about AI-written documents" because when you cannot tell whether a person is behind the words, the conversation about the work becomes worse and you cannot go back.

  2. Why it matters

    For a remote-first company with no hallway, losing that human signal threatens the kind of debate that Srivastava says produced almost everything good at the company, and she sees the same risk in music.

  3. What to watch

    Her position is a stated preference, not a company policy, so the test is whether she keeps AI out of Splice's own communication as the company pushes further into generative AI products.

WHO IT HITSThis lands on remote-first teams whose managers rely on written documents to debate ideas, and on creative-tools product leaders deciding how much AI to build into workflows where a human voice is the point.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Srivastava's comments come from a career spent between Silicon Valley and creative work — executive roles at Flickr, Yahoo, GitHub, and Adobe before Splice. At Splice she has expanded the platform by acquiring Spitfire Audio and overseen its moves into generative AI, while last year using an episode of Decoder to argue against the sort of "push-button, get-song" AI that has made companies like Suno controversial. Her skepticism, based on her questionnaire answers, has not faded.

What ties her answers together is a consistent test: whether a human is still making decisions that cannot be taken back. She applies it to documents at a remote-first company with no hallway to argue in, and to music, where she says the same thing is true. The recipe story — reconstructing her mother's food from strangers' YouTube videos — is her example of technology at its best, precisely because a person put something of themselves into it.

The stakes for Splice hinge on whether a stated personal preference becomes a practice inside a company that is also building AI products. If written documents are where a remote team's arguments live, the quality of those arguments may depend on how much of the writing still sounds like a person.

FAQ
Why is Kakul Srivastava careful about AI-written documents?
She says that once you cannot tell whether a person is behind the words, the conversation about the document becomes a different and worse conversation. She adds that you cannot really go back from that.
What is Splice's stance on AI in music?
Srivastava has spoken out against "push-button, get-song" AI of the kind that has made companies like Suno controversial. Splice has tried to offer AI products that keep the human at the center of the creative process.
What did Kakul Srivastava say about Splice being remote-first?
She says Splice is remote-first, so instead of a hallway, someone sits down, thinks something through, and a bunch of people argue with it. She says almost everything good at the company started that way.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleInstinct leads text-message AI agents after $1 billion raise