AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryFortune AIPublished: Nov 9, 2026, 19:01 JST

19.1% of US workers replaced by AI asked back, SHL finds

Send on LINE
19.1% of US workers replaced by AI asked back, SHL finds

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    SHL's June–July survey found 19.1% of U.S. respondents were replaced by AI and later asked to return; 51% of returnees wanted a substantial pay increase first.

  2. Why it matters

    The finding suggests some employers may be rehiring the same people at a higher cost after discovering AI could not fully cover the role, an early sign of limits to automation-driven job cuts.

WHO IT HITSHR and talent acquisition teams at companies that have cut roles citing AI are the most directly affected, as they may face rehiring demands for higher pay and written job-security guarantees. Younger workers aged 18 to 24 appear especially likely to experience the rebound, according to SHL.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

SHL's findings sit alongside other evidence that AI-related job cuts are still rising. Outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas counted 121,401 announced job cuts citing AI through October, more than double the 54,836 announced layoff plans for all of 2025. That suggests rebound cases are emerging even as more employers cite AI in workforce reductions.

A separate Robert Half survey from July points to why some reversals happen. Among U.S. hiring managers whose organizations eliminated positions because of AI, 32% later had to reinstate the same or similar roles. 40% of that group said the positions required institutional knowledge or context AI couldn't replace, while 39% cited relationship management and 38% said the roles needed more human oversight and quality control than expected.

Klarna and Ford illustrate the pattern in practice. Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski acknowledged the company had gone too far in its reliance on automation, according to Bloomberg, and a spokesperson said human agents were needed for complex, sensitive cases. Ford said AI had contributed to quality improvements but emphasized combining the technology with experienced engineering teams.

FAQ
What does SHL mean by 'AI rebounding'?
SHL uses the term for when an employer replaces a worker with AI and later asks that person to return. The firm says it shows some companies may be discovering the limits of replacing humans with AI.
What do returning workers want?
SHL found 51% wanted a substantial pay increase before agreeing to return. 42% said they would require written guarantees about future job security, and 40% wanted transparency about how AI would be used in their positions.
Which companies have already rehired humans after AI?
Klarna began recruiting human customer service representatives after relying heavily on AI chatbots, and Ford hired and promoted 350 experienced engineers in June after AI-powered quality control tools failed to perform as expected.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleKV キャッシュ cuts AI answer wait from 452秒 to 14秒