
Jabil and Corning both supply critical components for AI data centers, but Jabil trades at a lower valuation (20.56× forward earnings versus 40.61×) and offers faster expected growth—17.3% sales and 30.7% EPS growth in fiscal 2026 versus Corning's 15.8% and 29.8%.
Jabil's more diversified exposure to AI hardware demand, across electronics manufacturing services, networking, and power solutions, positions it as the more attractive entry point for investors, particularly as it carries a stronger analyst rating.
What happened
Jabil (JBL) and Corning (GLW) both benefit from AI data-center buildout, but analysis shows JBL trades at 20.56 times forward earnings versus 40.61 for GLW, and JBL's 2026 sales and EPS growth estimates are 17.3% and 30.7% respectively, topping GLW's 15.8% and 29.8%.
Why it matters
Jabil supplies electronics manufacturing services, networking, photonics, power and cooling for AI infrastructure across 100 locations in 30 countries, while Corning focuses narrowly on optical fiber and connectivity. JBL's diversification and lower valuation suggest less downside risk for investors betting on sustained AI infrastructure spending.
What to watch
JBL carries a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) versus Corning's Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Over the past year, Corning gained 140% compared with JBL's 46.2%, though JBL's valuation now appears more attractive for new entries.
Jabil Inc. and Corning Incorporated occupy complementary positions in the AI data-center supply chain, yet their business models and growth trajectories diverge in ways that matter for investors. Jabil is one of the largest global suppliers of electronics manufacturing services (EMS), offering not only contract manufacturing but also networking, photonics, power and cooling solutions tailored for AI infrastructure. The company operates across 100 locations in 30 countries, giving it geographic diversification and the operational flexibility to serve customers across multiple regions. Management is actively improving working capital and integrating AI and ML capabilities into its internal processes—a reflection of the company's ambition to enhance efficiency as demand for AI infrastructure accelerates. Jabil's top line is expected to benefit from strength in AI data-center infrastructure, capital equipment, and warehouse automation, while long-term tailwinds include the adoption of 5G wireless and cloud computing.
Corning, by contrast, has narrowed its strategic focus around five Market-Access Platforms: Mobile Consumer Electronics, Optical Communications, Automotive, Life Sciences, and Display. Its primary contribution to AI infrastructure is optical fiber and connectivity technologies essential for high-speed AI data-center networks. Beyond this, Corning is known for Gorilla Glass and manufactures specialty materials including glass, glass ceramics, fluoride crystals, glass substrates for LCD and PC displays, automotive glass, and laboratory equipment. The company has reorganized its operating structure to align business teams around these platforms, creating opportunities for asset and capability reuse across market ecosystems. Corning has demonstrated a leadership position in each of its five markets, and this reorganization has increased efficiency.
From a growth perspective, both companies show solid momentum for 2026. Jabil's Zacks Consensus Estimate projects sales growth of 17.3% and EPS growth of 30.7% on a year-over-year basis, with EPS estimates up 3.6% over the past 60 days. Corning's estimate stands at 15.8% sales growth and 29.8% EPS growth, with EPS estimates increased 2.5% over the past 60 days. The gap between them is narrow—JBL leads in both metrics by roughly 1.5 percentage points for sales and 0.9 percentage points for EPS.
Valuation tells a starkly different story. Jabil trades at 20.56 times forward earnings, while Corning trades at 40.61 times. Over the past year, Corning has gained 140%, compared with Jabil's 46.2%, indicating that the market has substantially repriced Corning's growth prospects. However, both companies face material risks. Jabil operates in a highly competitive landscape alongside domestic and international rivals like Sanmina, and geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, along with conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, create supply-chain and margin headwinds. Consumer-centric market weakness is also weighing on profitability. Corning's exposure is more concentrated: the Display and Optical segments account for more than half of total revenues, with Display dependent on consumer spending on LCD TVs and mobile PCs. Corning also faces tariff risk in China amid U.S.-China trade friction. Despite these risks, both companies are well-positioned for the sustained AI infrastructure demand expected in 2026. Jabil carries a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), while Corning holds a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), suggesting that analysts view Jabil as the more attractive entry point for new capital.
Jabil and Corning represent two distinct entry points into AI infrastructure demand, but with markedly different risk profiles. Jabil's strength lies in its horizontal integration—as a global electronics manufacturing services provider, it captures value across multiple layers of AI infrastructure: from foundational manufacturing services to specialized components like cooling and power solutions. This diversification is mirrored in its geographic footprint (100 locations in 30 countries), which provides both operational resilience and exposure to multiple regional AI buildouts. Corning, by contrast, is narrower in focus: its growth thesis rests primarily on optical fiber and connectivity, which are essential but represent a single choke point in the data-center supply chain.
The valuation gap—JBL at 20.56× forward earnings versus GLW at 40.61×—reflects the market's current preference for Corning despite the latter's more concentrated end markets. Corning's 140% gain over the past year has substantially repriced the stock, whereas JBL's more modest 46.2% rise suggests the market has not yet fully valued its diversification and AI tailwinds. The consensus growth estimates (JBL: 17.3% sales, 30.7% EPS; GLW: 15.8% sales, 29.8% EPS) are narrowly aligned, yet JBL achieves higher EPS growth at a lower valuation multiple, implying either more efficient execution ahead or unrecognized upside. Both companies face material headwinds—geopolitical tensions, U.S.-China trade friction, and cyclical consumer demand—but Jabil's broader customer base and manufacturing know-how may provide greater insulation against shocks to any single end market.
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Bank of America released a report concluding that artificial intelligence is unlikely to significantly displac…

IBM and Together AI have signed a $240 million agreement to build and operate an Nvidia-powered AI inference c…

Running a 122-billion-parameter model on three RTX 3090 GPUs with a 256K-token context, the author's AI agent…

Industry analysts and energy companies see artificial intelligence as a tool to increase oil extraction and re…

Healthcare investors are treating sector exposure as an indirect bet against artificial intelligence, with som…

NVIDIA and partners released multiple open-source AI models optimized for local execution throughout August, i…

The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.
Sign up free