
A new U.S. House bill would tax major AI companies to fund jobs if unemployment rises.
The rate starts at 2% and 3% and climbs with unemployment.
The proposal is part of a wider congressional effort to address AI-driven job displacement.
What happened
A new House proposal, introduced by Reps. Sara Jacobs, Greg Casar, and Valerie Foushee, would impose an excise tax on major AI companies. The tax rate would start at 2% on AI token value and 3% on AI service revenue when unemployment is 5% or less, and automatically rise as unemployment climbs.
Why it matters
The bill is part of a broader bipartisan push in Congress to prepare for potential AI-driven job displacement. Similar efforts include a Senate proposal by Ron Wyden, a call from Elizabeth Warren to tax AI companies based on data center energy use, and Bernie Sanders' plan for a one-time 50% tax on OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI.
What to watch
The bill's revenue would fund job creation in areas like housing construction, infrastructure, and child and elder care. No response yet from AI companies—OpenAI and Anthropic did not answer questions about supporting the proposed taxes.
Ask the AI about this article →
The bill reflects growing bipartisan concern in Washington that AI could cause mass unemployment, prompting lawmakers to seek new revenue sources. Previous efforts include studies on AI's impact on jobs, disclosure requirements for AI-related layoffs, and proposals to tax AI companies based on energy use. The new bill's automatic rate increase tied to unemployment is designed to scale support as disruption worsens.
Tech leaders themselves have voiced similar worries. Bill Gates argued the current tax system "nudges you toward replacing people with machines" and warned that "many jobs will disappear forever." Even executives at AI companies, like Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman, have acknowledged the need for new tax mechanisms or public stakes to redistribute AI gains, though their companies have not officially endorsed the proposed taxes.
The bill's fate remains uncertain, but it signals that AI taxation is becoming a mainstream policy discussion. With multiple proposals across both chambers, the debate over how to share AI's economic benefits—or mitigate its costs—is likely to intensify. For businesses, the outcome could shape future tax liabilities and workforce planning in an AI-driven economy.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Apple is pushing for expedited discovery in its legal battle against OpenAI, alleging the company is actively…

The Consumer Affairs Agency said Tuesday it will use generative AI to analyze about 900,000 annual consultatio…

The Supreme Court of Japan has included about ¥60 million in its fiscal 2027 budget request for AI-related exp…

OpenAI announced its support for California Senate Bill 1119, which aims to establish strong, age-appropriate…

Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey warned that advanced AI poses risks to financial infrastructure in a le…
Andrew Bailey, head of the world's financial stability watchdog, warned in a letter to G20 finance ministers a…
