Google is seeking licensing deals with major Hollywood studios to train its AI on copyrighted content.
These deals could bring studios billions but risk public backlash.
The outcome is uncertain.
What happened
Google has reportedly approached major studios like Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Universal to license their copyrighted content for AI training, offering hundreds of millions of dollars. A single character from a studio like Disney/Pixar could fetch around $40 million, with payouts potentially reaching billions.
Why it matters
These deals could give Google a significant edge in the AI race and help shift public perception of generative AI, which has turned negative. They also pose risks for studios, potentially alienating workers and audiences, and could lead to job losses in the entertainment industry.
What to watch
Whether any major studio will agree to a deal and produce visible AI-generated content. Lionsgate's 2024 licensing deal with Runway has yet to yield concrete results, but if a major studio follows through, it could prompt others to follow suit.
Ask the AI about this article →
Google's push into Hollywood comes as public sentiment toward AI has soured, especially among young people. The company sees licensing deals as a way to legitimize its technology and counter negative narratives. By partnering with iconic studios, Google could make AI-generated content more appealing and widely accepted.
The potential financial windfall for studios is significant, but the risks are equally notable. The backlash against AI in films like 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' shows that audiences are wary. Studios must weigh short-term gains against long-term reputational damage and the impact on their workforce.
The precedent set by Lionsgate and Runway, though not yet productive, signals a possible path forward. If a major studio like Disney or Universal were to embrace AI through a Google deal, it could trigger a wave of similar agreements, reshaping the entertainment industry. However, the hesitation from these studios suggests they are cautious about being the first to test public tolerance.
For example, today's edition would include:
AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.
Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
CrowdStrike extends its Falcon platform to police AI agents at the endpoint, treating each agent as an asset w…
PlayNitride Inc., a Micro LED maker, expects its technology to enter commercial optical communications applica…
McKinsey's 2025 survey found that while 65% of companies continuously use generative AI, fewer than 5% have ac…
Anthropic announced Enterprise Frontier Safeguards (EFS) on September 1, offering enterprise customers privacy…
Anthropic announced Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 on September 1
The U.S. pressed G20 members on Tuesday to take a hands-off approach to AI regulation and avoid creating new r…
