AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryAmazon AI BlogPublished: Oct 24, 2026, 04:00 JST

SageMaker AI multi-turn RL lifts gpt-oss-20b solve rate to 84% for $339

Send on LINE
SageMaker AI multi-turn RL lifts gpt-oss-20b solve rate to 84% for $339

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    AWS detailed a Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning pipeline on Amazon SageMaker AI that took gpt-oss-20b from a 61 to an 84 percent Wordle solve rate at serving settings, for about $339 in training tokens.

  2. Why it matters

    The result suggests small, low-cost models can be trained on whole-task outcomes rather than labeled steps, which the post positions for business-specific workflows public models were never trained on.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The guide comes from a practical gap AWS describes: supervised fine-tuning needs labels for each step, and single-turn reinforcement learning cannot credit a decision made several steps before the outcome. MTRL instead trains on one reward reported when an episode ends, with the agent hosted on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and the policy model living in the SageMaker AI training job. In the Wordle example, the dataset carries only the secret word, so the model never sees a target trajectory.

The reported numbers show why the evaluation setting matters. The training job's own validation curve peaked at 48 percent and ended at 37 percent at temperature 0, but at medium reasoning effort and temperature 1.0 the trained model solved 84 percent of held-out words against 61 percent for the base model. AWS notes the low-effort, temperature-0 pair corresponds to the training job's validation at steps 0 and 100, and that the adapter added 14–54 points across settings. The post also shares a reward-design revision: summing per-guess scores produced inversions where a lost game paid positive reward and a first-guess solve scored below a third-guess solve, which the final outcome-dominant formula corrects.

FAQ
How much did the training run cost?
The 100-step run consumed 491.6 million prefill, 159.7 million sample, and 643.3 million train tokens, totaling about $339 at GPT-OSS-20B list prices in us-east-1. The AgentCore runtime billed separately at about $79.
Which models can I train with this?
At the time of writing, MTRL supports Amazon Nova 2 Lite and GPT-OSS-20B in us-east-1 and us-west-2, and Gemma 4 31B and Qwen 3.6 27B in us-west-2.
Why did the validation curve show 37% while the evaluation showed 84%?
The training job's validation runs at temperature 0, while the 84 percent figure comes from evaluation at medium effort and temperature 1.0, the settings the model is served at.
Amazon AI BlogRead Original Article
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleOpenAI's Habitat cuts read latency to 10 ms for 1B users