
What happened
At OpenAI's Dev Day, CEO Sam Altman unveiled a "Decisions API" that gives the Luna model a predefined set of choices to pick between, mirroring TypeSafe AI's Jev for fast, cheap software automation.
Why it matters
This API is OpenAI's answer to the need for cheaper, faster AI that can pick from a set of options, a capability the broader AI world sees as the future of software automation.
What to watch
OpenAI released Decisions API only as a limited preview, so no developers have yet put it through its paces; the key test is how well its outputs align with real-life needs.
WHO IT HITSThis lands on developers building AI agents and automation tools, who may get a cheaper, faster way to add decision-making to their products now that OpenAI is offering it as a limited preview.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
OpenAI's Decisions API arrived as an aside from CEO Sam Altman at the company's Dev Day on Tuesday, but it signals a direct response to a model called Jev that TypeSafe AI released earlier this month. Jev is built on an LLM as a kind of super-powered classifier, letting developers give it a set of choices that it outputs as probabilities cheaply and at high speeds. Altman described the new API in similar terms, as a way to give OpenAI's Luna model a predefined set of options to choose between.
The subtext is that LLMs as we know them are not the right solution for a lot of software because they are comparatively slow and expensive. Developers have been using Jev to augment LLMs and found the results faster and cheaper. TypeSafe CEO Diogo Almeida, a former OpenAI engineer, joked on X about the beginning of the clone wars, adding that OpenAI's interest could be a sign that building in a System One compatible way is the future. He also said his company's moat is the synthetic data it creates to generate statistically useful outputs, and that "intelligence-per-dollar" is his North Star.
One likely application is monitoring and securing AI agents. After a series of incidents where its agents misbehaved on the open internet, OpenAI began using a separate model to watch for bad actions at significant compute cost. Shapor Naghibzadeh, who leads the startup QueryStory, built a demo that uses Jev to check each agentic action against its task, blocking bad actions, flagging others, and permitting the rest. In theory, such monitoring could have stopped the Hugging Face incident, and it cost $2.94 with Jev versus $372 with a frontier LLM. It seems clear these models have a future, but a key question is how well calibrated each of these decision models' outputs will be to real life.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
DIGITIMES reported the SiC substrate market is finally seeing signs of recovery, after prices collapsed when w…

HENNGE said on October 1 it set up HENNGE AI, a subsidiary with only two directors and no other employees, whe…

Pershing Square sold its entire Alphabet stake and topped off Microsoft while it sat about 20% below its Q2 hi…

Aolani will integrate Karman's power orchestration platform, built on a custom NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano and tar…

CloudNC raised $20 million led by Nimble Ventures, with Calculus Venture Capital, Entrepreneur First and LM Ve…

Solomon Asamoah laid out a framework for Ghana's AI infrastructure, arguing data-centre approvals should start…
