AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyWIRED AIPublished: Sep 18, 2026, 22:00 JST

NYC DSA post on AI alarmism draws 25,000 likes, splits left

NYC DSA post on AI alarmism draws 25,000 likes, splits left

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The NYC DSA's Tech Action Working Group posted an Instagram carousel on September 10 declaring AI alarmism and AI hype are the same distraction, drawing over 25,000 likes and dissent.

  2. Why it matters

    The post signals a widening split on the American left over whether to prioritize present AI harms or theoretical existential risks that some say echo tech companies' own messaging.

  3. What to watch

    The test is whether this internal disagreement reshapes which AI regulations the left actually backs, as a DSA convention resolution proposes support for a bill to ban superintelligence altogether.

WHO IT HITSThis lands on left-leaning organizers and Democratic candidates deciding which AI regulations to champion, potentially shifting resources toward present harms like data centers rather than existential risk.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The Instagram post was authored by the NYC DSA's Tech Action Working Group, which focuses on tech regulation for the chapter, and it came two days after Jacob Coxon, a researcher who had recently quit Anthropic, sounded the alarm about AI potentially bringing about the end of humanity. Alan Dang of Tech Action tells WIRED that socialists don't trust corporations to craft their own regulations, while Alexander McCoy argues that frontier AI abilities are true and increasing in power. Senator Bernie Sanders has enthusiastically taken up AI safety, and his data center moratorium bill released in March explicitly linked pausing construction with protecting the future of humanity. That positioning has put him in unusual alliances, including with Steve Bannon, and inspired statements from left-wing candidates. AI researcher Timnit Gebru has accused Sanders and others of taking cues from what she calls doomsday eugenicist cults, and one NYC DSA member privately asked, 'what happened?' Rumman Chowdhury of Humane Intelligence thinks all the attention AI safety discourse generates ultimately benefits frontier labs, which can point to a regulatory regime when pursuing IPOs. Pragathi Barusubramanian says existential risk doesn't come up at all on the ground, where the concern is that AI and data center companies don't have people's interests at heart. The outcome of this debate hinges on whether the left can agree on which regulations to back, and for whom—voters, candidates, and the companies themselves—the stakes look different.

FAQ
What did the NYC DSA Tech Action Working Group post?
An Instagram carousel on September 10 declaring that AI alarmism and AI hype are the same story, keeping attention on a science-fiction future to distract from real harms.
How did people react to the post?
It garnered more than 25,000 likes on Instagram, but some commenters disagreed, calling it a 'Horrible and dangerous take.'
What is the split within the left about?
Some question elevating theoretical AI concerns over actual harms and say repeating frontier lab claims empowers AI companies; others, like those following Senator Bernie Sanders, say both current and future harms can be addressed at once.

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Jensen Huang: don't regulate AI like social mediaSemafor Tech · 2h ago
  • 42 mathematical fellows warn Royal Society on AI riskTHE DECODER · 2h ago
  • OpenAI pays $6,500 to team that breached its GitHubFortune AI · 2h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleDoosan bets KRW968 billion on CCL expansion amid AI demand