AIToday
AI Coding AssistantsAI Safety & AlignmentAI Business & IndustryZenn AI/MLPublished: Nov 1, 2026, 06:00 JST

Phorion finds backdoor in official Claude Code extension 2.1.313

Send on LINE
Phorion finds backdoor in official Claude Code extension 2.1.313

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Phorion found a backdoor in official Claude Code extension version 2.1.313 on Cursor's marketplace; Ars Technica reported it stayed up about 12 hours. It runs on load, so users need not click anything.

  2. Why it matters

    The 'official' badge is no longer a safety guarantee, and how the attacker got into the official account is still unknown. Phorion urges affected organizations to bring in incident-response specialists; Cursor and other distributors have pulled the version.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The incident centers on distribution rather than the tool itself. The extension sat on Cursor's marketplace as an official Claude Code add-on, and the body says it stayed there for roughly 12 hours before being reported. Because the code executes on load, the exposure did not depend on any action by the user, which is what makes an official-looking package different from a random download.

The body also notes that how the official account was compromised is still unknown. On Macs, an attacker-side mistake may leave the external entry point closed in some cases, but the body says the key and the persistent mechanism remain, so that is not a reason for comfort. That unresolved question is likely to shape how organizations respond, since Phorion is asking affected organizations to bring in incident-response specialists rather than simply remove the extension.

The same day's other items point in a similar direction: a new Claude Code setting, blockWritesOutsideWorkingDirectories in v2.1.314, limits file writes to the working folder, but the body explicitly says it would not have stopped this backdoor, because it covers three write tools, not malicious extensions themselves. For teams delegating work to AI, the practical gap is between guarding what the tool does and guarding what gets shipped to the tool.

FAQ
Which version of the Claude Code extension is affected?
Version 2.1.313. Cursor has withdrawn the affected version, and the same version has been pulled from other distribution points as well.
Do users need to click anything for the backdoor to run?
No. The body says the malicious code runs the moment it is loaded, so users do not need to press anything.
What should people who installed it do?
Phorion calls on organizations that used it to bring in incident-response specialists. Individuals who study on their own should check the extension version number and, if affected, consult a computer security expert rather than just deleting it.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleCrawford Del Prete: AI task gains not yet in the numbers