AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Regulation & PolicyITmedia AI+Published: Sep 16, 2026, 10:01 JST

OpenAI in safety talks with Anthropic, Google DeepMind

OpenAI in safety talks with Anthropic, Google DeepMind

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    OpenAI global policy head Chris Lehane told a Washington briefing that talks with Anthropic and Google DeepMind began weeks ago, per Bloomberg on September 15.

  2. Why it matters

    Teaming up on safety standards can look like an illegal restraint of competition, yet Lehane said the three firms do not need an antitrust exemption. Anthropic and Google DeepMind declined Bloomberg's requests for comment.

  3. What to watch

    Whether regulators treat the talks as a genuine safety effort or a barrier to newcomers, a suspicion FTC chair Andrew Ferguson voiced on the same day. Watch whether Congress passes a bill this year.

WHO IT HITSAI policy and legal teams at frontier labs will have to judge whether coordinating on safety standards invites antitrust scrutiny, while US lawmakers weigh limited exemptions for sharing risk information.

Ask the AI about this article →

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The disclosure came at a delicate moment for OpenAI, which is coordinating with the two competitors it most often measures itself against. Lehane's framing — that safety cooperation is worthwhile and that no antitrust exemption is required — is a bid to head off the charge that competitors aligning on standards is simply a restraint of trade.

That charge is already in the air. On the same day, FTC chair Andrew Ferguson said he would view any exemption request from AI companies with deep suspicion, describing it as a moat built to keep challengers out. Congress is moving in two directions at once: Senator Bernie Sanders said he will introduce a bill next week to ban superintelligence, while the Banks-Schiff measure would grant a narrow exemption for sharing information on loss of control and cyber or biological threats. Bloomberg's reporting suggests the legislative route is unlikely to close this year, partly because the House leaves for the November election.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang sits on the other side of the argument, saying market forces are enough and that safe and rapid development can coexist. Where this lands hinges on whether regulators read cross-company safety talks as public-interest coordination or as a moat — and on whether any of the competing bills survives the election calendar.

FAQ
Who at OpenAI announced these talks, and where?
Chris Lehane, OpenAI's global policy chief, disclosed them at a briefing in Washington on September 15.
What does the proposed US bill on AI risk sharing do?
Republican Jim Banks and Democrat Adam Schiff proposed a limited antitrust exemption so companies can share information on loss of AI control and cyber or biological threats. Bloomberg reports it was folded into the annual defense bill, but is unlikely to pass this year.
What does Nvidia's Jensen Huang think about government action?
He said market forces let companies innovate safely and that new government measures are unnecessary. He called the choice between safe and fast development a false one, saying he will pace himself until he is confident the market will reward what he ships.

Also reported by TechCrunch AI

Get the latest AI Safety & Alignment news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • AIUC raises $40 million to audit frontier AI modelsSiliconANGLE AI · 1h ago
  • Amodei, Altman slowdown calls hit AI stocks, but fears called overblownYahoo Finance AI · 1h ago
  • Musk pitches mutual AI model checks ahead of Trump-Xi talksSemafor Tech · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleNvidia's $99 billion portfolio adds SpaceX as #2 holding