AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Safety & AlignmentGIGAZINE AIPublished: Oct 26, 2026, 06:00 JST

Cloudflare Turnstile misses all AI-agent browsing, Proof of Human finds

Send on LINE
Cloudflare Turnstile misses all AI-agent browsing, Proof of Human finds

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Tested on five questionnaires with 20 trials per system, Cloudflare Turnstile detected 0% of the three AI agents. hCaptcha caught 16% of Browser Use, 0% of Comet and 6% of Grok.

  2. Why it matters

    The systems reliably stopped scripted bots but largely waved through agents that read the screen and decide their own clicks, leaving a gap for site operators relying on them to block automation.

WHO IT HITSWebsite operators and security teams that rely on hCaptcha or Cloudflare Turnstile to block automated traffic may find those checks ineffective against AI agents, while fraud and abuse analysts monitoring sign-ups and forms face a harder screening problem.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The test set out to compare how well five bot-detection systems recognize two different things: scripted bots following fixed steps and AI agents that read a page and decide their next action. The scripted bots came in two forms — Chromium, which leaves automation traces, and CloakBrowser, which hides them and was configured to spoof browser data and use residential IP addresses. The gap between the two categories is the central finding: hCaptcha and Cloudflare Turnstile stopped the fixed-step bots at 95–100% but let most AI agents through. The researchers attribute part of this to how each check works. hCaptcha's image-selection puzzles tripped up the scripted bots but were solved by the three AI agents, which could recognize and answer them. Cloudflare Turnstile inspects browser state and, according to the team, let all three AI agents pass without ever presenting a challenge. reCAPTCHA v3, which scores users instead of posing puzzles, detected most agent activity. Yet even it caught none of the CloakBrowser runs. The team said it cannot say from this test whether the spoofed browser information, the residential IP address, or both were responsible. One limit remains open: the study did not measure false positives, and the researchers say human participants should be added to assess how often the systems mistake people for bots.

FAQ
Which system performed best overall?
Across all AI-agent and bot trials combined, Proof of Human had the highest detection rate at 99%, followed by reCAPTCHA v3 at 69.4%.
Did reCAPTCHA v3 stop the AI agents?
Yes, it detected Browser Use 95%, Comet 100% and Grok 72% of the time by scoring rather than issuing image puzzles. But it caught 0% of the bot using CloakBrowser.
Why could the researchers not explain the CloakBrowser result?
CloakBrowser was set to spoof browser information and route traffic through residential IP addresses. The team said this test alone cannot tell which factor, or both, let it evade detection.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleMeta shifts AI liability to advertisers starting Oct 30