AIToday
Large Language ModelsAI Business & IndustryGIGAZINE AIPublished: Oct 13, 2026, 13:00 JST

Meta's Muse Wonder Full scores 56, tops rivals' flagships

Meta's Muse Wonder Full scores 56, tops rivals' flagships

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Meta announced Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full on October 12, 2026. The models scored 52 and 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, and Muse Wonder Full beat Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1, OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Google's Gemini 4 Argon.

  2. Why it matters

    Meta's Muse series has reached frontier-class performance in about half a year, matching the flagships of Anthropic, OpenAI and Google on a leading composite benchmark.

WHO IT HITSEnterprises buying AI subscriptions or building on APIs now have a fourth frontier-class vendor to evaluate alongside Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, which may affect pricing and procurement decisions. Developers using paid coding assistants may see Meta's Muse series as an alternative.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Meta's Muse series has moved quickly. Alexandr Wang said the company originally shipped Muse Spark in April, and that Meta has continued to scale its models across pre-training and reinforcement learning, now reaching the frontier. The October 12, 2026 launch of Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full shows that roughly six months of scaling work has been enough to put Meta's models alongside the flagships of Anthropic, OpenAI and Google on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Meta is also tying the models' capabilities to two named concepts. Active memory is the ability to record important items about a user and actively search for task-relevant details, while active focus is the ability to keep working on difficult tasks by exploring alternatives and adapting to new information. Meta says the Muse Wonder series combines these two to deliver strong coding ability, and that it also tracked safety metrics such as the rate of executing unapproved code and mishandling personal information, where Meta's models show lower rates than those of Anthropic and OpenAI.

Access is being kept to Meta's paid Muse Code subscription for both models, while Muse Wonder is additionally available through an API. The API pricing Meta lists is $4 per 1 million tokens for input, $0.20 for cached input and $20.00 for output. For businesses already paying for rival coding assistants, this launch gives them a new option to test, though which model performs better on any specific workload is not something the benchmarks alone settle.

FAQ
How much does the Muse Wonder API cost?
Meta charges $4 per 1 million tokens for input, $0.20 for cached input and $20.00 for output.
What is the difference between Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full?
CEO Mark Zuckerberg describes Muse Wonder as a model that delivers frontier-level performance at high speed, while Muse Wonder Full is positioned as the full version.
How do the Muse Wonder models perform on safety?
Meta says the Muse Wonder series was developed with safety in mind, and charts show it has a lower rate of executing unapproved code and mishandling personal information than Anthropic's and OpenAI's models.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleMeta's Muse Wonder Full tops GPT-6 Astra on legal agent test