AIToday
Large Language ModelsSiliconANGLE AIPublished: Oct 13, 2026, 10:01 JST

Meta's Muse Wonder Full tops GPT-6 Astra on legal agent test

Meta's Muse Wonder Full tops GPT-6 Astra on legal agent test

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Meta released Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, agent models for long, multistep tasks such as insurance claims. Muse Wonder Full passed 13.1% of tasks in Artificial Analysis' version of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, versus 8.6% for GPT-6 Astra.

  2. Why it matters

    The result positions Meta's new model ahead of a rival on a test that requires a deliverable to meet every criterion and pass hallucination checks, though Meta's runs of competing models were best-effort and not optimally tuned, the model card cautions.

WHO IT HITSDevelopers building agent workflows can now access Muse Wonder through Meta's Model API and Muse Code, while enterprises evaluating legal or coding agents may weigh its benchmark results against rival models, though Meta's own caveats about best-effort comparisons apply.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Meta's release of Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full builds on the pretraining and reinforcement learning methods introduced with Muse Spark in April, and the models were trained at Meta's gigawatt-scale Prometheus data center. Muse Wonder takes over the top of the Muse lineup from Muse Spark 1.3, which Meta Superintelligence Labs released six weeks ago. Meta's personal agent, Muse, has run on Muse Spark since its U.S. launch on Sept. 8, and Muse Wonder will power that agent soon.

The models introduce Active Memory, which carries context from one conversation to the next, and Active Focus, which keeps the model working through hard tasks by trying other approaches and checking in with the user before important actions. Prompts can mix text with video, audio, and images across a 1 million-token context window, with answers returning only in text.

On coding, Muse Wonder Full led two long-horizon tests, DeepSWE 1.1 and SWE-Marathon, the latter scoring 57.5% to 46.3% for Claude Opus 5.5. However, Claude Opus 5.5 finished ahead on ProgramBench, HealthBench Pro, and the OSWorld V2.1 computer-use benchmark, and on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, the Anthropic model came out two points clear at 58. Meta's research post calls Muse Wonder its most aligned model to date, with a 0% harmful-action rate on an agentic misalignment test. A full safety report is promised soon.

FAQ
How can developers access Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder is available starting today through the Meta Model API and Muse Code. Muse Wonder Full is limited to Muse Code subscribers.
What makes Muse Wonder Full stand out from rivals?
It passed 13.1% of tasks on Artificial Analysis' version of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, where GPT-6 Astra came closest at 8.6%. It also led two long-horizon coding tests, DeepSWE 1.1 and SWE-Marathon.
What safety concerns does Meta flag for Muse Wonder Full?
Meta does not rule out Muse Wonder Full reaching the high-risk threshold for chemical and biological threats without mitigations. With safeguards in place, it rates moderate or lower across all three risk domains in the Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework.
SiliconANGLE AIRead Original Article

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleMusk's Terafab chipmaking push starts to take shape