AIToday
AI Regulation & PolicyZenn AI/MLPublished: Oct 8, 2026, 22:00 JST

Japan government gives AX an official definition: AI as premise

Japan government gives AX an official definition: AI as premise

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    The cabinet-approved Basic Plan on AI (2nd phase, July 14, 2026) and the Priority Plan (July 21, 2026) define AX as reviewing decision-making and work processes with AI as a premise, across all organizations.

  2. Why it matters

    This shifts the target from business models and processes to who decides what — and expands the scope from companies to government, municipalities and semi-public fields like healthcare and education, per the plans.

WHO IT HITSDX officers, AI leads, and public-sector planners in Japan now have a single government definition to cite, and agency CAIOs must operationalize it. Companies that spread generative AI tools without redesigning decision-making do not meet that definition, the plan itself notes.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The term AX spread quickly in Japan during 2026, often meaning different things to different people — from handing generative AI tools to every employee to treating DX as obsolete. The government's first Basic Plan on AI, approved on December 23, 2025, defined "AI Transformation" by swapping "data and digital technology" for "AI" in METI's DX definition, keeping the rest nearly identical — in effect, DX by AI means, aimed at companies. That changed roughly half a year later: the second-phase plan, dated July 14, 2026, was subtitled "Japan AX, stronger and wealthier," broadened the subject to "all organizations," moved AI from tool to premise, and narrowed the focus to decision-making and how work is done. The same week, the Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform 2026 and the Japan Growth Strategy were also approved, the latter calling AX the "accelerator," and the former using the heading "promotion of AX/DX." METI, which owns the DX definition, opened a Digital Governance Study Group on July 15, 2026, noting that companies' use of AI "remains at PoC and partial use." Meanwhile IPA's survey data shows adoption rising but results skewed toward internal efficiency, with document summarization and drafting dominating. The article's practical advice is to ask which decisions, in which tasks, are split between AI and people — unfinished answers there usually point back to the DX foundation of data and digitized operations.

FAQ
What is the difference between DX and AX under the government definitions?
DX is using digital technology and data to create or flexibly change business models. AX is reviewing decision-making and how work is carried out, with AI as a premise, across all organizations.
Does AX replace DX?
No. The Priority Plan describes AX as greatly accelerating and expanding prior DX efforts, and the government refers to them together as "AX/DX." Without the DX foundation, AX cannot advance, the article says.
Is AX written into Japanese law?
No. The AI Act does not contain the word AX. The definition sits in cabinet-approved documents such as the Basic Plan on AI and the Priority Plan.
How are Japanese companies actually using AI today?
In IPA's DX Trends 2026 survey, 91.6% of firms cited efficiency or speed gains from AI, but only 3.9% cited higher sales or profits. About 26.1% said DX and AI are pursued separately.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleArmature's agent.reviews lets AI agents rate software