AIToday
Large Language ModelsMIT Technology Review AIPublished: Aug 10, 2026, 19:00 JST6 min read

Four startups challenge transformers, the engine of all major LLMs

Four startups challenge transformers, the engine of all major LLMs

Key takeaway

  • A new wave of startups is developing alternatives to transformers, the neural network architecture underlying every major language model, because transformers become prohibitively expensive and inefficient as text lengths grow.

  • Subquadratic is developing sparse attention mechanisms, Manifest AI has created power retention, Liquid AI combines liquid neural networks with transformers, Inception uses diffusion (borrowed from image generation), and Pathway is exploring non-language representations.

  • These approaches claim to deliver comparable performance while dramatically cutting computational cost and energy consumption, though some claims remain skeptical in the industry.

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    MIT Technology Review examined a wave of startups building alternatives to transformers, the neural network architecture that powers every major language model today. The startups—Subquadratic, Manifest AI, Liquid AI, Inception, and Pathway—are developing sparse attention, power retention, liquid neural networks, diffusion-based generation, and non-language-based architectures to address transformers' core limitation: the computational cost explodes as text length grows.

  2. Why it matters

    Transformers require 50 million multiplications to process a 10,000-word document, driving enormous energy costs—OpenAI is set to spend $50 billion on computing this year, and the International Energy Agency predicts data center electricity consumption will double by 2030. Transformers also struggle to maintain large context windows and handle reasoning tasks efficiently, bottlenecks that become critical as LLMs tackle harder problems. These startups claim their approaches can make models faster, cheaper, and more efficient without sacrificing performance.

  3. What to watch

    Subquadratic claims its sparse attention model SubQ rivals mainstream LLMs on search and coding tasks, with thousands on its waitlist. Liquid AI's hybrid models match rivals four times larger and run on a $50 Raspberry Pi; the company has achieved almost 34 million downloads. Inception's diffusion-based Mercury 2 reportedly matches GPT-4 performance at 10 times faster speed. Pathway's Dragon Hatchling solved more than 97% of 250,000 hard sudoku puzzles, outperforming leading models from major labs.

In Depth

Read the full story

In the summer of 2017, Google researchers published 'Attention Is All You Need,' introducing the transformer architecture. This neural network proved exceptionally effective at processing long sequences of text, and nine years later, transformers power every major large language model in the market. Justin Dangel, cofounder and CEO of Subquadratic, calls them 'one of the most important innovations in the history of computer science.'

Yet transformers are beginning to show limitations. The mechanism at their heart, called dense attention, works by comparing every token (word or part of a word) in a text with every other token via multiplication. This encodes meaning with remarkable accuracy but becomes computationally expensive as text grows. A 10,000-word document requires 50 million multiplications. The costs are staggering: OpenAI is set to spend $50 billion on computing this year, according to president Greg Brockman. The International Energy Agency predicts data center electricity consumption will double by 2030. Beyond cost, transformers struggle to maintain large context windows—the amount of information they can track simultaneously—a critical limitation for reasoning models (which use chain-of-thought scratch pads) and agents (which need to process output from other LLMs or entire code bases).

Four startups are pursuing distinct solutions. Subquadratic, based in Miami, has developed SubQ, a sparse attention model that calculates relationships between only some word pairings instead of all of them. The company claims it rivals top mainstream LLMs on search and coding tasks, though skepticism persists in the industry. Thousands have signed up for its waitlist, and the company plans wider availability soon. Manifest AI, based in San Francisco, takes a different approach: power retention, which stores only the most relevant information and maintains a rolling summary of context rather than tracking everything. The company claims to have updated a decade-old technique and demonstrated it by converting StarCoder (an open-source coding LLM) into PowerCoder and releasing Brumby, which it says rivals versions of Alibaba's Qwen model. Cofounder and CTO Carles Gelada identified applications in analyzing hours-long videos and building agents that can stay on task for weeks.

Liquid AI, an MIT spinout based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, pairs transformers with liquid neural networks to build what CEO Ramin Hasani calls liquid foundation models (LFMs). These models are far smaller and more energy-efficient, running on small chips in vehicles and even on a $50 Raspberry Pi. They are available free to organizations with annual revenue under $10 million and have been downloaded almost 34 million times. Liquid neural networks, inspired by worm brains and descended from convolutional networks, adapt their behavior to new information as they process it—a capability transformers lack once training is complete. Liquid AI's hybrid models use a 20% transformer, 80% liquid neural network ratio and match the performance of rivals four times larger, including Qwen and Google's Gemma.

Inception, based in Palo Alto, applies diffusion—the technique that powers most image and video generation—to text. Rather than generating one word at a time, diffusion LLMs produce whole blocks of text at once. In 2024, cofounder and CEO Stefano Ermon (also a Stanford researcher) and colleagues solved the mathematical challenge of applying diffusion to text, training a model that matched GPT-2 performance at 10 times faster speed. Today, Inception claims Mercury 2 performs as well as some OpenAI GPT-4 models (released in 2023) but again 10 times faster. Ermon says the only metrics that matter are speed and cost: 'Ultimately, the currency is going to be intelligence per dollar.' Google is also experimenting with diffusion and has built a prototype called Diffusion Gemma.

Pathway, also based in Palo Alto, pursues perhaps the most radical approach: freeing LLMs from language constraints. Its Dragon Hatchling model (named after dragons in Terry Pratchett's Color of Magic) achieved a high score solving hard sudoku puzzles, beating more than 97% of 250,000 puzzles—a benchmark where several leading models from top labs failed to solve any. The point Pathway wants to make is that language-free representations may unlock capabilities transformers cannot reach.

Context & Analysis

The transformer architecture, introduced by Google researchers in 2017 and described in the paper 'Attention Is All You Need,' has become the foundation of every major LLM on the market. Its ability to process long sequences of data, particularly text, made it revolutionary. However, as LLMs have grown in scale and capability—especially with the rise of reasoning models and larger context windows—transformers' core strength has become a bottleneck. The dense attention mechanism that made transformers powerful is fundamentally limited by its computational complexity, which scales with the square of input length.

This limitation has become acute precisely because of what LLMs are now asked to do: reasoning models require chain-of-thought scratch pads that expand the data an LLM must process, and next-generation systems (agents) need to ingest entire libraries of documents or code bases. The energy and cost implications are real—OpenAI's $50 billion annual computing spend and the International Energy Agency's projection of doubled data center electricity by 2030 underscore the urgency. The startups profiled represent four distinct philosophical approaches: making attention itself smarter and sparser, replacing attention with alternative mechanisms, using hybrid architectures that blend old and new neural network types, and borrowing generative techniques from other modalities. That multiple independent teams are pursuing fundamentally different solutions suggests the transformer successor is not yet obvious, but the search is well underway.

FAQ

What is the core problem transformers face?
Transformers use dense attention, which compares every word with every other word via multiplication. Processing a 10,000-word document requires 50 million multiplications, making the computational cost grow rapidly as text length increases. This also limits how much information (context window) transformers can keep track of at once.
How much energy do LLMs consume today?
OpenAI is set to spend $50 billion on computing this year. The International Energy Agency predicts that total electricity consumed by data centers will double by 2030.
Which startups are building alternatives and what are their approaches?
Subquadratic uses sparse attention (calculating only some word pairings instead of all). Manifest AI uses power retention (rolling summaries of context). Liquid AI pairs liquid neural networks with transformers. Inception applies diffusion (from image generation) to generate whole text blocks at once. Pathway builds non-language-based representations like Dragon Hatchling.
MIT Technology Review AIRead Original Article

Get the latest Large Language Models news every morning

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, Slack, or Discord.

Free · takes 30 seconds · unsubscribe anytime

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleNvidia sees Taiwan pivoting from factory to engineering partner

The AI news that matters, in one minute each morning.

Sign up free