AIToday
Large Language ModelsASCII.jpPublished: Nov 8, 2026, 10:01 JST

リクルートエージェント tops AI job-agent picks at 99.3% mention rate

Send on LINE
リクルートエージェント tops AI job-agent picks at 99.3% mention rate

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    In Branding Works' October 2026 survey of ChatGPT and Gemini (143 valid responses), リクルートエージェント appeared in 99.3% of answers with an average rank of 1.3, and ranked first on both AIs.

  2. Why it matters

    The same question yielded different candidate lists depending on the AI — ビズリーチ scored 64% on ChatGPT versus 100% on Gemini — suggesting firms' AI visibility may hinge on which model customers ask, not on a single ranking.

WHO IT HITSRecruiting firms and job-board operators that depend on being named in AI answers now face a channel where visibility varies sharply by model; marketing and SEO teams at these companies may need to track mentions across ChatGPT and Gemini separately rather than treating AI search as one ranking.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

The survey's timing matters: asking ChatGPT or Gemini for a service recommendation is becoming a routine consumer behavior, and Branding Works argues that whether an AI names a company now influences customer acquisition. Its methodology was deliberately narrow — one identical question, sent three times a day to two models over 24 measurement days, yielding 143 valid responses after one API error was excluded — so the results describe a snapshot rather than a stable ranking.

The split between the two models is the more telling finding. ビズリーチ and レバテックキャリア were named in 100% of Gemini answers but only 64% and 62% of ChatGPT answers, while パソナキャリア went the other way (58% on ChatGPT, 15% on Gemini). Because answers are also shaped by which sites the AI cites — career.oricon.co.jp alone accounted for 18.9% of citations, with comparison and ranking sites dominating the top five — a company's placement on those sites appears to influence whether an AI recommends it, though Branding Works frames this as an observed pattern rather than a proven causal link.

Branding Works is itself selling services into this gap: it offers AI search optimization (AIO/LLMO) starting at ¥15,000 per month with no initial fee, and its two-month intensive plan at ¥250,000 per month is positioned for companies that want to act before year-end budgets close.

FAQ
Which AI was used in the survey?
The survey queried ChatGPT (model gpt-5.1) and Gemini (model gemini-3.1-pro) via their APIs, with web search enabled, three times per measurement day over 24 days.
How often did AI answers cite career.oricon.co.jp?
career.oricon.co.jp was the most-cited source, with an 18.9% citation share, followed by jipcc.or.jp at 8.6% and tennavi.net at 6.7%.
What criteria did the AI use to introduce agencies?
Answers tended to introduce agencies by three angles: support quality (in 86.7% of answers), number of job listings (74.1%), and high-class job openings (67.1%).
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleUBS's Matthew Carter: widen AI bets beyond tech giants