AIToday
Large Language ModelsLatent SpacePublished: Oct 13, 2026, 19:01 JST

Meta's Muse Wonder scores 52, Wonder Full 56 on AA Index

Meta's Muse Wonder scores 52, Wonder Full 56 on AA Index

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Meta Superintelligence Labs shipped Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, scoring 52 and 56 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 versus Muse Spark 1.3's 48, roughly 14 months after the lab was founded.

  2. Why it matters

    Wonder Full ranks top three on 6 of 10 evals and leads GDP.pdf and CritPt at 33%, positioning Meta's second-generation family near the frontier on agentic tasks.

WHO IT HITSMuse Code subscribers and developers using the Meta Model API gain a frontier-tier model for agentic coding and professional tasks. Enterprise IT teams weighing which AI model to standardize on now have another credible option at $4 input / $20 output per million tokens.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

Meta Superintelligence Labs was founded roughly 14 months before this launch, and Muse Spark was its first model family. Mark Zuckerberg described Wonder as "a much larger and more advanced class of models that brings us to the frontier." Alexander Wang said Meta continued scaling both pre-training and reinforcement learning since Spark shipped in April.

The launch split availability deliberately: Wonder is the faster frontier model available via the Meta Model API and Muse Code, while Wonder Full is the larger model restricted to Muse Code subscribers. Wonder will also power the Muse personal-agent product, with subscribers getting it first. On launch day, both models drained Muse Code quotas abnormally fast — a bug fixed the same day with a quota reset for all users.

Third-party evaluator Artificial Analysis put Wonder Full at 56 and Wonder at 52 on its Intelligence Index, against Spark 1.3's 48. The gap between Spark 1.3 and Wonder releases was only 6 weeks. Wonder Full improved on all ten index evals, with the largest gains in agentic categories: Terminal-Bench 4.0 went from 33% to 57%, and GDPval-AA v2.1 rose from 1681 to 1857 Elo. Wonder Full ranked top three on 6 of 10 evals, taking #1 on GDP.pdf and CritPt at 33%.

Meta presented plots showing performance on non-post-trained tasks versus post-trained tasks as evidence against benchmark overfitting, which some researchers singled out approvingly. Internally, Alexander Wang said research "starts with evals," with MSL building a Personal Superintelligence Index rather than chasing external benchmarks. Jason Wei summarized the effort as "scaling prevails," noting that much of Meta pivoted to support the model, including business development teams hiring human experts for data review.

The launch drew mixed reactions. Some early users ranked it alongside Opus 5.5 and praised its distinct prose style, while skeptics estimated Meta remains about 3–6 months behind OpenAI and Anthropic. The same day, Artificial Analysis launched a three.js scene benchmark where Claude and Astra models led — a pointed counter to Meta's emphasis on real-world agentic tasks over 3D rendering demos.

FAQ
How much does Muse Wonder cost?
Muse Wonder costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, with cached input at $0.20. Muse Wonder Full has no published token price.
Who can use Muse Wonder Full?
Muse Wonder Full is available only to Muse Code subscribers on Power or Maximum Usage plans. Muse Wonder is more broadly available via the Meta Model API and Muse Code.
How does it compare to Claude Opus 5.5?
On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3, Opus 5.5 leads at 58, ahead of Muse Wonder Full's 56. However, Wonder Full tied Claude Code + Sonnet 5.5 at 68 on the Coding Agents Index, ahead of Opus 5.5 at 66.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleGMO AI&ロボティクス商事 opens pre-orders for Unitree G1+ humanoid