AIToday
AI Regulation & PolicyAI Business & IndustryThe Verge AIPublished: Sep 24, 2026, 04:00 JST

Newsom signs seven bills to make data centers disclose energy, water use

Newsom signs seven bills to make data centers disclose energy, water use

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed seven bills, including AB 1577 requiring monthly energy reporting and AB 2619/AB 2469 requiring water disclosures, starting next year.

  2. Why it matters

    The transparency is meant to show whether data centers are raising electricity bills, draining water, and meeting sustainability commitments—questions researchers say they couldn't answer without basic facts.

  3. What to watch

    Water disclosures only happen at permit or license application, not yearly, so the data may reflect a wet or cool year rather than actual annual use; implementation details are still being worked out.

WHO IT HITSThis affects data center operators in California, who will need to track and report energy and water use and potentially pay separate power rates. It also gives local communities and environmental researchers their first consistent data on these facilities' resource consumption.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

For years, data centers have expanded into communities across the US, prompting protests over their potential strain on power grids and water systems. A key frustration has been the lack of basic information: it's difficult to see exactly how much electricity or water these facilities consume.

California's new laws attempt to close that gap. The seven bills signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom go beyond disclosure, directing the California Public Utilities Commission to create separate power rates for data centers to recover grid connection costs, and removing categorical exemptions from environmental review. But significant gaps remain. Water disclosures are only required at permitting or licensing, not annually, so they may not reflect actual yearly usage or whether companies are meeting sustainability goals.

The stakes hinge on whether the data will be enough to determine which scenario is unfolding: one where data centers drive up costs for other ratepayers, or one where they bring bills down. As Mark Specht of the Union of Concerned Scientists notes, it's impossible to say definitively now. But the laws signal to the industry that lawmakers and the public are paying attention—and that data centers are something that can be regulated.

FAQ
What exactly do the new California laws require data centers to disclose?
AB 1577 requires monthly reporting on energy consumption. AB 2619 and AB 2469 require water disclosures when applying for permits or business licenses.
Why is water use data from data centers so hard to get?
Santa Clara University researchers found that every water provider in districts with data centers refused to share data, citing privacy regulations. Few data centers also had public environmental impact reports.
Could data centers actually lower electricity costs for Californians?
A scenario in a Union of Concerned Scientists fact sheet shows they could, because spreading fixed grid maintenance costs across more customers can bring bills down—but only if data centers contribute to distribution system costs rather than connecting to the transmission system.

Get the latest AI Regulation & Policy news every morning

For example, today's edition would include:

  • Trump slams AI oversight at UN as Sam Altman heads to Security CouncilFortune AI · 1h ago
  • Pope's AI Adviser Warns of 'Cartel' Rule-Setting by Big LabsWIRED AI · 1h ago
  • Sanders, Casar bill: 20 years prison for superintelligenceThe Verge AI · 1h ago

AI-summarized, only the topics you pick — one digest a day via Email, LINE, or Slack.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Related Articles

Next articleGallup: 68% of daily AI users in US worry