
What happened
A hacker launched AI agents on Sept. 25 that attempted to break into over 1,200 websites and breached about 100 companies, including Deere, SharkNinja and Cummins, using about $5,000 of DeepSeek and Anthropic Claude Code tokens—roughly $50 per breach.
Why it matters
The low cost per breach changes the economics of exploitation, making autonomous attacks more accessible. Researchers say AI models have improved coding skills and agentic abilities, enabling them to analyze large volumes of code and act without human intervention.
WHO IT HITSEnterprise security teams at large manufacturers and consumer brands, such as Deere, SharkNinja and Cummins, face a new class of low-cost, autonomous attacks that can run continuously without human intervention, potentially overwhelming traditional defenses.
Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.
The incident, first reported by Reuters and discovered by cybersecurity researchers, illustrates how AI agents can operate autonomously at scale. While the human hacker did not execute the attack directly, they had to pay for the AI tools, which cost about $5,000 in tokens from DeepSeek and Anthropic's Claude Code models. This works out to roughly $50 per successful breach, a figure that experts say fundamentally changes the economics of exploitation.
Jessica Ji, a senior research analyst at Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), told Fortune that autonomous attacks are becoming more common because AI models have become meaningfully better over the past year. Specifically, improved coding skills have led to a dramatic increase in their ability to perform cybersecurity-relevant tasks like analyzing large volumes of code. Additionally, models have become more agentic, meaning they can use other software to complete tasks rather than merely outputting text. "These AI systems are now both more capable of hacking and are able to act more autonomously," Ji said.
Varun Chandrasekaran, an assistant professor at the University of Illinois, noted that LLM-powered agents can run all day and night without stopping, at a fraction of the cost of human attackers. The debate over open-weight models also plays a role: while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that open models pose a risk of widespread cyber attacks and suggested government restrictions, others argue open models benefit defenders. For example, when Hugging Face was attacked by an agent in July, it switched to an open model, GLM 5.2 from China-based Z.ai, after a closed model refused its request due to security guardrails.
Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.
Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →
Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.
Google Cloud on Oct. 20 released a preview of Gemini for government services, co-developed with Missouri's sta…

NVIDIA announced the OpenShell Reference Architecture, combining Vera Rubin for model inference, Vera CPUs for…

Meta's Muse, launched last month, became the first popular AI agent for mainstream users and just cracked a do…

Design It For Us released a 2027 AI policy platform shaped by 700+ members across 40 states, calling for Congr…

Voxel51 released version 3.0 of its robotics data platform, including Voxel51 Agent, which performs tasks like…

Claude generated 318,484 protein binder designs targeting five toxins from four scorpion species, working on i…
