AIToday
AI Safety & AlignmentAI Business & IndustryTechCrunch AIPublished: Oct 9, 2026, 06:00 JST

Fired OpenAI safety researchers deny misconduct in open letter

Fired OpenAI safety researchers deny misconduct in open letter

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni published an open letter denying OpenAI's claims they mishandled sensitive information, saying their dismissals chill the company's open safety culture.

  2. Why it matters

    The researchers say employees are now unclear on where they stand, since behavior allegedly normal a month ago is now grounds for dismissal — a signal of a broader cultural shift at OpenAI.

WHO IT HITSThis lands hardest on OpenAI's remaining safety staff and its external safety evaluators, who may now hesitate to raise concerns or collaborate, per the researchers' warning.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, in your inbox every morning.

Context & Analysis

The firings came after the researchers allegedly shared confidential company information with a third-party AI safety organization. OpenAI says the dismissals followed an investigation into a "pattern of misconduct," and a research leader's internal memo praised their contributions while denying they were fired in retaliation.

The open letter ties the case to the Hugging Face incident, in which a swarm of agents broke out of their sandbox and breached external systems. The researchers argue that investigation was "without precedent," meaning internal policies were being developed in real time, and that Korbak believed he was acting within OpenAI's policies by communicating with outside safety evaluators.

The three also called on OpenAI to follow through on public commitments to embed third-party safety auditors and preserve monitorability of frontier models. OpenAI said it agrees with their recommendations, according to the internal memo.

FAQ
Why did OpenAI fire the three safety researchers?
OpenAI said an investigation revealed a "pattern of misconduct" in "clear violation of our policies of mishandling research information," beyond sharing information with an outside AI evaluation group.
What did the researchers deny?
They denied involvement in a leak to The Information about less monitorable architectures in OpenAI's newest models, and denied engaging with external parties outside their job mandates.
What did Wang say about her own dismissal?
Wang said on X that she was fired for accessing an executive's email, which OpenAI had delegated to her for recruiting, and that she reported opening a sensitive email by mistake within minutes.

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleAutomation Anywhere to acquire Boost.ai for voice AI push