AIToday
Large Language Modelsnote AIPublished: Nov 4, 2026, 04:00 JST

Gemini 4 Carbon tops Intelligence Index v5 but trails Claude Opus 5.5 in coding

Send on LINE
Gemini 4 Carbon tops Intelligence Index v5 but trails Claude Opus 5.5 in coding

3 Key Points

  1. What happened

    Google unveiled Gemini 4 Carbon on October 28; Artificial Analysis ranked it #1 on Intelligence Index v5 with 59 points, but #2 on its Coding Agent Index behind Claude Opus 5.5.

  2. Why it matters

    The top overall score does not mean a clean sweep, since the model is not yet generally available and trails behind the leading coding model.

WHO IT HITSEnterprise AI teams evaluating coding assistants should note that Claude Opus 5.5 still leads on coding tasks, while teams focused on long-running agent work or cybersecurity may want to trial Gemini 4 Carbon once it becomes available.

Not sure about something? Ask the AI

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Summaries like this, every morning.

Context & Analysis

Gemini 4 Carbon builds on Gemini 4 Argon, which Google released just two weeks earlier on October 14, and carries over the same multi-layered safety measures. Google describes the new model as its strongest yet, designed for long-running engineering tasks and cybersecurity work, and says internal teams have seen it persist through multi-step engineering problems over several days — a claim the company has not independently verified.

The ranking picture is more nuanced than the headline number suggests. On the Intelligence Index v5, Carbon takes first place overall with 59 points, but it tops only four of the nine underlying evaluations. Artificial Analysis credits its lead to complex reasoning, knowledge, and science tasks, while noting the model is not top in coding or knowledge work. On the separate Coding Agent Index, Carbon sits 3 points behind Claude Opus 5.5 running in Claude Code at 62 points, though the evaluator frames this as a notable improvement for Google, which has lagged in coding.

Pricing and access remain open questions. The introductory rates mirror Argon's, but Google has not disclosed how long they last, and the model is initially limited to a subset of cybersecurity defenders before broader distribution through the Fairwind Program. For teams weighing a switch, the practical takeaway is to map current use cases and budget for both pricing tiers while waiting for a firm general-availability date.

FAQ
Is Gemini 4 Carbon available to the public?
No. Google is first providing it to some cybersecurity defenders and then widening access through its Fairwind Program, with no date set for general availability.
How much does Gemini 4 Carbon cost?
Introductory API pricing is $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; after the introductory period, it rises to $4 and $20. Google has not said when the introductory period ends.
How does Gemini 4 Carbon compare with Claude Opus 5.5 on cost?
Artificial Analysis calculated a cost of $7.76 per task for Gemini 4 Carbon at standard pricing, about 23% cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $10.04.
Send on LINE

AI news that matters for your work, delivered every morning.

Pick your industry and the AI tools you use, and get news related to your work every day.

Free · 30 seconds with Google · unsubscribe anytimeWhat is AIToday? →

Ask AI

Ask AI anything about this article. The AI reads this article, earlier AIToday articles, and Wikipedia, and cites its sources. Q&As are published on this page for other readers too.

Questions and answers are published on this page.

Related Articles

Next articleSinkhorn and the 1781 roots of AI's optimal transport